These days, one of the complex subjects that people choose is aerospace. When software is added to the equation, the subject even get more confusing. When it comes to the aerospace subject, you can choose two different training systems. DO-178B and DO178C are the two training systems that you can choose when you decide to take the subject I mentioned above. A lot of people do not know the right training system to choose because they are not the same. But if you click this website, you will learn about the difference between DO-178B and DO178C. Also you will learn that the two training systems are aerospace software development guidelines when you click here for more. DO-178B and DO178C training systems play an important role because they both guide companies and people developing avionics software.
The safety and compliance protocols for aerospace software programs can be verified by the two training systems I mentioned above. Because each training system plays an important role, the national guidelines require all the new systems to follow one of them. Those two training systems I mentioned above are not the same but, on the other hand, the changes are small but critical. Those sorts of changes are the ones that are accustomed by the aerospace software industry. Those changes have to be adopted by companies because they help them remain at the top of their game. Aerospace software companies have to follow all guidelines and safety regulations to stay informed about their products approval and distributions.
Even though the training systems I mentioned above are different, DO178C is a refined version of and DO-178B. When switching DO-178B to DO178C system, a lot of issues are faced by companies. They need to know some important differences between the two training programs first for them to have a smooth transition. When DO-178B was being revised, the committee addressed current software development and verification technology changes. The addressed changes that mostly affected the software level. A software level is the hazard analysis rating system. The failures experienced by the software are classified in a five part system by the rating system.
The failure of the software is rated either catastrophic, hazardous, major, minor, or no effect by the rating system. The rating system describes the severity level of failure if a specific component fails mid flight when a company uses a piece of software for its airplane. When the word catastrophic is used to rate a failure, the airplane might crash. The plane will experience a substantial negative impact when the failure is described as hazardous by the rating system.